Come see, What some call discipleship, others evangelizationnew or whatever, or some speak of discernment and application of spiritual gifts. Confess it and move on. Zambia, 11 March 1974 If Communion is given only under the species of bread, the Priest raises the host slightly and shows it to each, saying, The Body of Christ. Some advocates of communion on the tongue, at least online, seem guilty of thinking that (however much more virtuous than I they probably are in their lives). Particularly in regard to this way of receiving communion, experience suggests certain matters requiring careful attention. I do make the point that reverence, while important, is not the only or most important aspect of Communion. All of us are only grasping a hint of it. Here in India Communion is distributed both on tongue and in hand. Ive updated the post. The life of Christ, the Holy Spirit, animates each of us individually, and all of us corporately and guides us together in our efforts to become one in Christ. Fire came down and consumed the sacrifices of Elijah After receiving Communion our bodies become holy chalices. Madagascar 2 March 1970 95% of parishes shrinking, seminaries empty, young people disengaged: it will happen in Africa and Asia too when the culture of the secular West overwhelms the Third World. What is the proper way of receiving Communion in the hand? - AOD Your email address will not be published. Whatever procedure is adopted, care must be taken not to allow particles of the Eucharistic bread to fall or be scattered. "You're talking to someone who has only owned a smartphone for a yearI resisted," he said. A letter from the Congregation for Divine Worship to presidents of bishops conferences on May 29, 1969: AAS 61 (1969) 546-547; Notitiae 5 (1969) 351-353: In reply to the request of your conference of bishops regarding permission to give communion by placing the host on the hand of the faithful, I wish to communicate the following. I wholeheartedly agree with your comment on another thread that this ongoing discussion is frivolous and is only causing needless division. Pope Paul Vl calls attention to the purpose of the InstructionMemoriale Dominiof 29 May 1969, on retaining the traditional practice in use. This means that Jesus has no eyes but our eyes, no feet . Cyril of Jerusalem and Theodore of Mopsuestia liken the practice to that of receiving a king, and both of them note the method of reception was in joined hands (also described in other sources as hands in the form of a cross). Holt Orders cannot sustain the Church, no matter how much traditionalists preach priests are of the utmost importance. The Truth About Communion in the Hand | The Fatima Center Maybe this is part of a grand conspiracy by Satan to destroy the Church (ok, probably not that). How to Receive the Eucharist | Catholic Answers Featured Image: Rossano Gospels, Last Supper, 6th c.; Source: Wikimedia Commons, PD-Old-100. There are particles, and there are particles. 5. For this alone is the eating referred to by our Lord ( John 6:58 ). The condition is the complete avoidance of any cause for the faithful to be shocked and any danger of irreverence toward the Eucharist. The Council was a start, but we have allowed ourselves to get sidetracked in silly and divisive banter. Whether to receive Communion in the hand or on the tongue are liturgical disciplines, not dogmas. Pope Paul Vl calls attention to the purpose of the InstructionMemoriale Dominiof 29 May 1969, on retaining the traditional practice in use. 3. Canada, 12 February 1970 Have reverence for the honor which God has bestowed upon it, and do not lead it down to the vileness of sin.[27]. http://www.kathpedia.com/index.php?title=Handkommunion. The author claims that Communion in the hand could only be authorized in countries where it was an established practice but doesnt give a citation. In this case, the person is to be mindful of the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, including the intention of confessing as soon as possible (canon 916). Several readers pointed out that I made no mention of a text of St. Cyril when mentioning the historical foundations of the practice. Above all, it is necessary to have the introduction of the rite preceded by an effective catechesis so that the people will clearly understand the meaning of receiving in the hand and will practice it with the reverence owed to the sacrament. The elements were placed in the hands (not in the mouth) of each communicant by the clergy who were present, or, according to Justin, by the deacons alone, amid singing of psalms by the congregation (Psalm 34), with the words: The body of Christ; The blood of Christ, the cup of life; to each of which the recipient responded Amen. (eminent Church historian Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church: Ante-Nicene Christianity: A.D. 100-325 [Vol. Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA. And of course Pope Paul VI was adamant that all the reforms carried out under him were faithful to the Second Vatican Council. However, he should not refuse to administer Communion to those faithful desirous of availing themselves of a legitimate authorization. The True Story of Communion in the Hand Revealed - OnePeterFive 2. Therefore I stand by what I wrote in the original: In this context I think it is fair to say that the present practice of Communion in the hand is not a simple restoration of a historical custom but rather introduced a new practice in new circumstances which, while it has some historical justification, is essentially motivated by current pastoral concerns in some parts of the world.. A parish priest, or the rector of a sanctuary, might have objective reasons for not applying the permission if there is any danger of profanation or lack of respect. Care must also be taken that the communicants have clean hands and that their comportment is becoming and in keeping with the practices of the different peoples. These views are sometimes strongly held. The host will then be laid in the palm of the left hand and then taken by the right hand to the mouth. Paul VI had a measure of it in 1974, and we hav emostly missed the wisdom of Evangelii Nuntiandi. [16] Bede, Ecclesiastical History of the English People, 4.24. Is the Catholic Church ever going to bring back communion wine? ODonaghues post, I note with interest that the countries in which Communion in the hand is alleged to have been most prevalent either did not apply for or at any rate receive an indult in these first 8 years of results. In this context, I think it is fair to say that the present practice of Communion in the hand is not a simple restoration of a historical custom but rather introduced a new practice in new circumstances which, while it has some historical justification, is essentially motivated by current pastoral concerns in some parts of the world. The Reception of Holy Communion at Mass | USCCB Cyril of Jerusalem [c. 313-386], Catechetical Lectures, 23:21-22) Several more but no room here. Or is there more context that is missing? But as time passed it became the practice to receive Communion directly on the tongue in order to assure that the Host was received reverently. Among Catholics, there is a sincere difference of opinion with respect to the opportunity of this practice, as to its possible spiritual benefits or detriments. To be honest, I dont really belong to either camp on this, and like you, I think the polarization on this issue is doing more harm than good. The Church understands the Communion Procession, in fact every procession in liturgy, as a sign of the pilgrim Church, the body of those who believe in Christ, on their way to the Heavenly Jerusalem. It also happens, on occasion, that the free choice of those who prefer to continue the practice of receiving the Eucharist on the tongue is not taken into account in those places where the distribution of Communion in the hand has been authorized. It is now August 2020 and I can say that you have been proven wrong. My simple point is that the individual ways our Church evolves over history have a significant impact on its life thereafter, often in ways we dont expect. 843 1; cf. Those who receive Communion may receive either in the hand or on the tongue, and the decision should be that of the individual receiving, not of the person distributing Communion. There are many devout Catholics who find this practice helpful. I have celebrated Mass in places where there is no Communion in the hand and yet have observed some people approach the Eucharist in a slovenly and distracted manner with nary a trace of reverence in sight. Todd, yes, the Church as a whole is growing thanks to the great efforts of missionaries in Africa and Asia (many are now coming back here), and yes, more people are receiving the Sacraments now than ever. It must be presumed that a priest has sufficient formation in moral principles so as to exclude an erroneous conscience in such matters. Ever since the InstructionMemoriale Dominithree years ago, some of the conferences of bishops have been requesting the Apostolic See for the faculty to allow ministers distributing communion to place the eucharistic bread in the hand of the faithful. We should rejoice in that. Monaco, 31 October 1969 So Indian Bishop conference have not got any Indult for communion in hand? cites vote tallies to defend a claim that a large majority (longe plurimos) of bishops not only oppose introducing Communion in the hand but consider it tum sensui tum spirituali cultui [] offensioni When the communion is distributed under both kinds, it is never permitted to place in the hands of the communicants hosts which have first been placed in the Blood of the Lord. United States, 17 June 1977 It must also increase their faith in the sublime reality of the Lords body and blood, which they touch with their hand. When permitted, the choice as to the form of reception falls upon the communicant and not upon the priest. First, Cyril: Coming up to receive, therefore, do not approach with your wrists extended or your fingers splayed, but making your left hand a throne for the right (for it is about to receive a King) and cupping your palm, so receive the Body of Christ; and answer: "Amen." [20] Here is what Theodore says: This practice has been requested by individual episcopal conferences and has received approval from the Apostolic See. If, however, Communion is given under both kinds, the rite prescribed in nos. Henry Percival and ed. I dont read any statement with canonical force saying that only those countries may apply for an indult. My country is not on this list but holy communion is the norm. To signify, seal, and apply to believers all the benefits of the new covenant. They are also to be instructed not to omit after communion the sincere and appropriate thanksgiving that is in keeping with their individual capacities, state, and occupation. 2023 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Gross Alexander NPNF 13, ed. Does anyone have an explanation for why France, Germany, and the Low Countries were not quickly regularized once the opportunity was available? The faithful should consume the host before returning to their place; the ministers part will be brought out by use of the usual formulary, The body of Christ, to which the communicant replies: Amen. Some may choose to receive the Lord on the tongue while others choose to receive in the hand. PDF Instructions on Receiving Holy Communion with Proper Reverence Their attitude of reverence must measure up to what they are doing. A. The debate was interrupted by lunch. If one is receiving in the hand the following is normative: upon approaching the minister of the Host extend the hands in the middle of the chest. The Holy See has made it abundantly clear that both manners of reception of Communion - on the tongue and in the hand - are permitted, that Communion should be received reverently, and that the manner of reception should not become an occasion of division in the church. awr. Your email address will not be published. How to Properly Receive Communion on the Hands - catholiclegion We pray that these will lessen and finally disappear, in keeping with Christ's prayer for us "that they may all be one" (Jn 17:21). Instead, this option must increase in them a consciousness of the dignity of the members of Christs Mystical Body, into which they are incorporated by baptism and by the grace of the Eucharist. | Irondale, AL 35210 |. On the part of both the minister and the recipient, whenever the host is placed in the hand of a communicant there must be careful concern and caution, especially about particles that might fall from the hosts. Communion on the Tongue Is an Apostolic Tradition The rite of communion in the hand must not be put into practice indiscriminately. When the bishops reassembled, Cardinal John Carberry of St. Louis, a determined opponent of Communion in the hand, was quick to get up to set things straight. But whatever the case, it is the Pope who decides to authorize it for countries, and it is indisputable that he did so.
Fox30 Action News Jax Reporters,
Entouch Wireless Account Number And Pin,
Does Blood Type Affect Covid Vaccine Side Effects,
Power Memorial High School Basketball,
Adding Meters Calculator,
Articles OTHER